Percell Freeman v. Carolyn W. Colvin

580 F. App'x 500
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 8, 2014
Docket14-1532
StatusUnpublished

This text of 580 F. App'x 500 (Percell Freeman v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Percell Freeman v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 580 F. App'x 500 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Percell Freeman appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his action challenging *501 the Social Security Administration’s decision to disqualify him from appearing before the agency as a non-attorney representative pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(a). After careful de novo review, see Jenkins v. Kansas City Mo. Sch. Dist., 516 F.3d 1074, 1080 (8th Cir.2008), we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was re *501 ferred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. Kansas City Missouri School District
516 F.3d 1074 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 F. App'x 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/percell-freeman-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2014.