Perazza v. Emmet County Road Commission
726 N.W.2d 38, 477 Mich. 1004, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 182
This text of 726 N.W.2d 38 (Perazza v. Emmet County Road Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Perazza v. Emmet County Road Commission, 726 N.W.2d 38, 477 Mich. 1004, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 182 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Joseph PERAZZA and Susan Perazza, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
EMMET COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are *39 not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 N.W.2d 38, 477 Mich. 1004, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perazza-v-emmet-county-road-commission-mich-2007.