Peralta v. State

197 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12838, 2016 WL 4473315
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 2016·No. No. 1D15-4611·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the state’s proper concession of error, the judgment and sentence in this matter is hereby VACATED, and the cause is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c) (2005). See Haug v. State, 151 So.3d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peralta v. State, 197 So. 3d 654, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12838, 2016 WL 4473315 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

197 So. 3d 654 (Peralta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haug v. State
151 So. 3d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)