Peralta v. Port of New York Authority

76 Misc. 2d 1086, 351 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1200
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided July 20, 1973·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, an employee of an airline, brings this action in contract of bailment and in negligence for damages sus[1087] tained when her automobile disappeared from- a parking lot made available at a cost for employees of airlines at the John F. Kennedy International Airport.

The stipulation of facts indicates, inter alia, that the method of operation of the lot was such that entry necessitated the insertion of a magnetic card into a islot of a machine but that exit through an unmanned gate did not.

While there was some measure of control by defendant over the lot it “ operated and controlled,” essentially, there was no such assumption of dominion and control as would create a bailment (see Ellish v. Airport Parking Co., 69 Misc 2d 837, affd. 42 A D 2d 174). Nor was there proof of a negligent act or omission, in the facts as stipulated.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

Concur — Groat, P. J., Schwartzwald and Margett, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peralta v. Port of New York Authority, 76 Misc. 2d 1086, 351 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

76 Misc. 2d 1086 (Peralta v. Port of New York Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sealey v. Meyers Parking System
147 Misc. 2d 217 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1990)
Garlock v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.
103 Misc. 2d 943 (Buffalo City Court, 1980)
Linares v. Edison Parking, Inc.
97 Misc. 2d 831 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1979)
Motors Insurance v. American Garages, Inc.
98 Misc. 2d 887 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Broadview Apartments Co. v. Baughman
350 A.2d 707 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1976)