Peralta v. Despaigne
This text of 5 A.D.3d 192 (Peralta v. Despaigne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered on or about March 27, 2002, which directed that defendants-appellants would be deemed to have conceded liability if they failed to appear for examinations before trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, so as to vacate the directive deeming defendants to have conceded liability.
We find that it was an error to direct that defendants-appellants would be deemed to have conceded liability in the event that they failed to appear for examinations before trial, without a showing of willful or contumacious conduct. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.3d 192, 772 N.Y.S.2d 809, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peralta-v-despaigne-nyappdiv-2004.