Peralta v. Adams
2 Cal. 594
This text of 2 Cal. 594 (Peralta v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peralta v. Adams, 2 Cal. 594 (Cal. 1852).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court; Murray, Chief Justice, concurring.
A mandamus is not the proper remedy where an inferior Court refuses to enter a judgment for costs. The party complaining has the right to appeal from such a defective judgment, or he may resort to his action for the costs.
The judgment of the District Court is reversed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cal. 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peralta-v-adams-cal-1852.