Peralli v. Pitkat
This text of 561 A.2d 986 (Peralli v. Pitkat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order imposing sanctions against her and requiring her to make weekly payments for child support and the sanctions. The plaintiff’s essential claim is that the court’s determination of her earning capacity was unsupported by the evidence. Our examination of the record indicates that there was ample evidence for the trial court to determine the plaintiff’s earning capacity. We will not retry the facts. Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc., 15 Conn. App. 804, 543 A.2d 287 (1988).
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 A.2d 986, 19 Conn. App. 803, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peralli-v-pitkat-connappct-1989.