Peralli v. Pitkat

Connecticut Appellate Court

Peralli v. Pitkat

561 A.2d 986, 19 Conn. App. 803, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 237

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided June 21, 1989·No. 7395·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order imposing sanctions against her and requiring her to make weekly payments for child support and the sanctions. The plaintiff’s essential claim is that the court’s determination of her earning capacity was unsupported by the evidence. Our examination of the record indicates that there was ample evidence for the trial court to determine the plaintiff’s earning capacity. We will not retry the facts. Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc., 15 Conn. App. 804, 543 A.2d 287 (1988).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order imposing sanctions against her and requiring her to make weekly payments for child support and the sanctions. The plaintiff’s essential claim is that the court’s determination of her earning capacity was unsupported by the evidence. Our examination of the record indicates that there was ample evidence for the trial court to determine the plaintiff’s earning capacity. We will not retry the facts. Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc., 15 Conn. App. 804, 543 A.2d 287 (1988).

There is no error.

Peralli v. Pitkat, 561 A.2d 986, 19 Conn. App. 803, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 237 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

561 A.2d 986 (Peralli v. Pitkat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related