Perales v. State
This text of 471 S.W.2d 401 (Perales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The offense is possession of heroin; the punishment, enhanced by two prior non-capital felonies, life.
This is another Mary Hernandez case from Travis County. Each of the grounds of error advanced by the appellant has heretofore been decided by this Court in Gomez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 461 S.W.2d 422; Arechiga v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 462 S.W.2d 1; Corpus v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 463 S.W.2d 4. Appellant’s fourth ground of error has been discussed in Martinez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W.2d 399 (this day decided) and need not again be discussed. This appellant’s excellent brief in this case has not shaken our conviction that the cases cited were properly decided.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 S.W.2d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perales-v-state-texcrimapp-1971.