Peraica v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co.

71 N.E.3d 588, 28 N.Y.3d 1167, 49 N.Y.S.3d 94, 2017 NY Slip Op 64362, 2017 WL 628886, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 207
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 16, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 71 N.E.3d 588 (Peraica v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peraica v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co., 71 N.E.3d 588, 28 N.Y.3d 1167, 49 N.Y.S.3d 94, 2017 NY Slip Op 64362, 2017 WL 628886, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 207 (N.Y. 2017).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 780-781 [1997]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitfield v. City of New York
689 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 N.E.3d 588, 28 N.Y.3d 1167, 49 N.Y.S.3d 94, 2017 NY Slip Op 64362, 2017 WL 628886, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peraica-v-ao-smith-water-products-co-ny-2017.