Peraica v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co.

71 N.E.3d 588, 28 N.Y.3d 1167, 49 N.Y.S.3d 94, 2017 NY Slip Op 64362, 2017 WL 628886, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 207
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 2017·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 780-781 [1997]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peraica v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co., 71 N.E.3d 588, 28 N.Y.3d 1167, 49 N.Y.S.3d 94, 2017 NY Slip Op 64362, 2017 WL 628886, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 207 (N.Y. 2017).

71 N.E.3d 588 (Peraica v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitfield v. City of New York
689 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)