Peragallo v. Oneto

133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 889, 14 Stock. 889, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 508

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 17, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peragallo v. Oneto, 133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 889, 14 Stock. 889, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 508 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

133 A. 920 (Peragallo v. Oneto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.