Peragallo v. Oneto

133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 889, 14 Stock. 889, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 508
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 17, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 A. 920 (Peragallo v. Oneto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peragallo v. Oneto, 133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 889, 14 Stock. 889, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 508 (N.J. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rizzi v. Pohan
134 A. 846 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 889, 14 Stock. 889, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peragallo-v-oneto-nj-1926.