Pera v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

569 U.S. 970, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1062, 133 S. Ct. 2381, 81 U.S.L.W. 3637, 2013 WL 1942405, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3807
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 2013·No. No. 12–9173.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until June 3, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pera v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., 569 U.S. 970, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1062, 133 S. Ct. 2381, 81 U.S.L.W. 3637, 2013 WL 1942405, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3807 (2013).

569 U.S. 970 (Pera v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.