Pepson v. Ableman

New York Supreme Court

Pepson v. Ableman

2 How. Pr. 102

DecidedFebruary 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 102 (Pepson v. Ableman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pepson v. Ableman, 2 How. Pr. 102 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Bronson, Chief Justice.

The case was improperly noticed for argument; it was in fact a bill of exceptions; but was not signed by the late circuit judge, therefore was not in a situation to be noticed. On the other side they have been dilatory.

Decision.—The rule taken by default in December last va[103]*103cated, and the bill of exceptions referred, back to the late cir cuit judge for resettlement and his signature.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson, Chief Justice.

The case was improperly noticed for argument; it was in fact a bill of exceptions; but was not signed by the late circuit judge, therefore was not in a situation to be noticed. On the other side they have been dilatory.

Decision.—The rule taken by default in December last va[103]*103cated, and the bill of exceptions referred, back to the late cir cuit judge for resettlement and his signature.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pepson-v-ableman-nysupct-1846.