Peppers v. State

636 So. 2d 205, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4832, 1994 WL 190005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1994·No. No. 93-1864·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The state concedes error based on the recent decision of Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993). This cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to correct appellant’s sentence. On remand, appellant’s sentence imposed under Count II shall continue to run consecutive to the sentence imposed under Count I. Appellant’s sentence imposed under Count III shall continue to run consecutive to the sentence imposed under Counts I and II. Appellant’s habitual offender and three-year minimum mandatory sentence imposed under Count IV shall be corrected to run concurrently with the sentence imposed under Count III. The cause is affirmed in all other respects.

REVERSED in part and REMANDED for resentencing.

MINER, MICKLE, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peppers v. State, 636 So. 2d 205, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4832, 1994 WL 190005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 205 (Peppers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
630 So. 2d 527 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)