Peppers v. Coil
This text of 38 S.E. 823 (Peppers v. Coil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where in the foreclosure of a landlord’s lien the defendant-contested the lien and gave a replevy bond for the eventual condemnation-money, and the case was appealed to the superior court, where the jury found •against the defendant, it was legal and proper to enter up judgment against the defendant, and also against the sureties on the replevy bond, without further notice to them. Civil Code, §§ 2817, 5342.
2. In such a proceeding it was not necessary for the levying officer to take a forthcoming bond. Civil Code, §2816, par. 8 ; Herrington v. Saulsbury, 52 Ga. 396 ; Wynn v. Knight, 53 Ga. 568.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 S.E. 823, 113 Ga. 234, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peppers-v-coil-ga-1901.