Pepper v. Taylor

Sixth Circuit

Pepper v. Taylor

54 F. 32, 4 C.C.A. 169, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1414

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 1893

DocketNo. 77

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 F. 32 (Pepper v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pepper v. Taylor, 54 F. 32, 4 C.C.A. 169, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1414 (6th Cir. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed on the grounds clearly stated by the judge who heard the cause, and rendered said decree. The proof establishes that the appellant accepted a return of the horse under such circumstances and conditions as to warrant the finding that he made his election to rescind the contract of sale, and thereby became bound to indemnify the appel-lees for what they had to pay on the notes, which the appellant should have canceled, surrendered, or taken up himself.

The decree is affirmed, with costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the lower court is affirmed on the grounds clearly stated by the judge who heard the cause, and rendered said decree. The proof establishes that the appellant accepted a return of the horse under such circumstances and conditions as to warrant the finding that he made his election to rescind the contract of sale, and thereby became bound to indemnify the appel-lees for what they had to pay on the notes, which the appellant should have canceled, surrendered, or taken up himself.

The decree is affirmed, with costs,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F. 32, 4 C.C.A. 169, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pepper-v-taylor-ca6-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack