Pepper v. State
211 S.W.3d 185, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, 2007 WL 90948
Opinion
ORDER
Dana Pepper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his conviction and ten-year sentence for sale of a controlled substance near schools, section 195.214, RSMo 2000. Mr. Pepper claims on appeal that his guilty plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily because he was not afforded the benefit of an agreement that he reasonably believed he had with the prosecutor. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pepper v. State, 211 S.W.3d 185, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, 2007 WL 90948 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
211 S.W.3d 185 (Pepper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ivory v. State
211 S.W.3d 185 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)