Pepper v. Pepper

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pepper v. Pepper

548 So. 2d 849

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1989·No. Nos. 89-689, 89-690·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court acted within the bounds of a sound discretion and therefore affirm the modification of the child support award in all respects. See Meltzer v. Meltzer, 262 So.2d 470, 471 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); Meltzer v. Meltzer, 400 So.2d 32, 33 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). As the order of March 6, 1989, was intended to make clear that the award supersedes the parties’ earlier agreement with respect to weekly child care, we reject appellant’s assertion that the awarded amount should be reduced in 1990 in accordance with the parties’ now-superseded agreement.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court acted within the bounds of a sound discretion and therefore affirm the modification of the child support award in all respects. See Meltzer v. Meltzer, 262 So.2d 470, 471 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); Meltzer v. Meltzer, 400 So.2d 32, 33 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). As the order of March 6, 1989, was intended to make clear that the award supersedes the parties’ earlier agreement with respect to weekly child care, we reject appellant’s assertion that the awarded amount should be reduced in 1990 in accordance with the parties’ now-superseded agreement.

Affirmed.

Pepper v. Pepper, 548 So. 2d 849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

548 So. 2d 849 (Pepper v. Pepper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related