Pepper v. Pepper

Superior Court of Delaware

Pepper v. Pepper

62 A. 232, 21 Del. 450, 5 Penne. 450, 1905 Del. LEXIS 38

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedOctober 11, 1905

DocketNo. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 A. 232 (Pepper v. Pepper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pepper v. Pepper, 62 A. 232, 21 Del. 450, 5 Penne. 450, 1905 Del. LEXIS 38 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Boyce, J.:

—We are unanimous in opinion that the evidence adduced in this case is not sufficient to warrant a verdict in favor of the exceptants. And we would disregard such a verdict. It becomes our duty, therefore, to give the jury binding instructions against the exceptants. '

Gentlemen of the jury:—We direct you to find that there was not fraud and collusion between Horace B. Pepper and Rebecca P. Pepper, administratrix c. t. a. of Harriett H. Cannon, deceased.

(The jury rendered its verdict accordingly.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyce, J.:

—We are unanimous in opinion that the evidence adduced in this case is not sufficient to warrant a verdict in favor of the exceptants. And we would disregard such a verdict. It becomes our duty, therefore, to give the jury binding instructions against the exceptants. '

Gentlemen of the jury:—We direct you to find that there was not fraud and collusion between Horace B. Pepper and Rebecca P. Pepper, administratrix c. t. a. of Harriett H. Cannon, deceased.

(The jury rendered its verdict accordingly.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A. 232, 21 Del. 450, 5 Penne. 450, 1905 Del. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pepper-v-pepper-delsuperct-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack