Peppard v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

6 Misc. 599
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 15, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Misc. 599 (Peppard v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peppard v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 6 Misc. 599 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The substantial questions presented by the appeal in this case have been passed upon in the case of plaintiff’s fellow-passenger, Michael Toomey, against the same defendant (4 Misc. Eep. 392). For the reasons assigned in that case upon which the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was sustained, and there being no new question in the present case which deserves special notice, the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fbeedman and Gildebsleeve, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Misc. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peppard-v-delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1893.