Peplowski v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLC

Opinion

JNaecvka Pd.a BSutartdee nB,a Er sNqo. . 6918 Jacquelyn Franco, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 13484 Dallin Knecht, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 16263 BACKUS | BURDEN 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 872-5555 (702) 872-5545 jburden@backuslaw.com dallinknecht@backuslaw.com Attorneys for Defendant, Albertson’s LLC DISTRICT OF NEVADA SHARON PEPLOWSKI, an individual, ) Case No. 2:21-cv-01990-ART-VCF ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALBERTSON’S LLC, a Foreign Limited ) CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR Liability Company, d/b/a ALBERTSON’S #93, ) PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER BOULDER INVESTCO, LLC, a Foreign ) FOR 14 DAYS Limited Liability Company, SUPERIOR ) ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND ) PLUMBING, INC., a Foreign Corporation, ) DOE EMPLOYEES I through X, and ROE ) BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X inclusive ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff SHARON PEPLOWSKI (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, Kevin R. Hansen, Esq. and Amanda A. Harmon, Esq. of the LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN R. HANSEN, and Defendants Albertson’s LLC (“Albertson’s”), by and through its attorneys of record, Jack P. Burden, Esq. and Dallin Knecht, Esq. of the law firm of BACKUS | BURDEN, and Defendant Ferris, Esq., of the law firm LUH & ASSOCIATES, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of the deadline to file the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by fourteen (14) days. The Proposed Joint Pretrial Order is currently due to the Court by June 20, 2023. The Parties anticipate potential resolution of this case prior to trial. The requested extension will allow the parties sufficient time to engage in discussions regarding resolution and/or prepare the Joint Pretrial Order. Pursuant to LR IA 6-1(a), the Parties hereby aver that this is the first extension requested as it relates to the Joint Pretrial Order. Moreover, pursuant to Local Rule 26-3, it is respectfully submitted by the Parties’ that good cause exists for an extension of this deadline, as mentioned above. Further, failure to request the instant extension prior to the filing deadline was the result of excusable neglect; specifically noting the failure to request the extension at an earlier date was a mere oversight by the Parties. See Bateman v. U.S. Postal Service, 231 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2000). Further: 1) there is no danger of prejudice as the extension is stipulated by the Parties; 2) a thirty (30) day extension will not impact a trial date because the same has not been scheduled; 3) the Parties are hopeful to attend a settlement conference prior to trial; and 4) the requested extension is made in good faith by the Parties. Pioneer Investment Services v. Brunswick Associate’s, Ltd., 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As such, the Parties stipulate and agree to jointly ask the Court to extend the deadline to submit the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 14 days to July 4, 2023. DATED: this 20th day of June, 2023. DATED: this 20th day of June, 2023. LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN R. HANSEN BACKUS | BURDEN By: /s/___ Kevin R. Hansen By: /s/ Dallin Knecht Kevin R. Hansen, Esq. Jack P. Burden, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6336 Nevada Bar No. 6918 Amanda A. Harmon, Esq. Dallin Knecht, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15930 Nevada State Bar No. 16263 2625 S. Rainbow Blvd. St. C-106 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89146 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Sharon Peplowski Albertson’s LLC DATED: this 20th day of June, 2023 . . By: /s/ D. Jason Ferris D. Jason Ferris, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 7698 8987 W. Flamingo Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 (702) 367-8899 Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Defendant Superior, Electrical, Mechanical & Plumbing, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES SHALL SUBMIT THE PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER BY JULY 4, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. 21st DATED THIS DAY OF JUNE 2023 .,