Peploe v. Connors

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Peploe v. Connors

30 Misc. 800, 63 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 800 (Peploe v. Connors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peploe v. Connors, 30 Misc. 800, 63 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record shows that the trial justice found that the plaintiff had done .the work in a thorough workmanlike manner, and, therefore, the questions propounded to defendant’s experts which were disallowed by the trial justice became immaterial. If the work was, in fact, finished as required by the contract, the questions above referred to were unnecessary.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record shows that the trial justice found that the plaintiff had done .the work in a thorough workmanlike manner, and, therefore, the questions propounded to defendant’s experts which were disallowed by the trial justice became immaterial. If the work was, in fact, finished as required by the contract, the questions above referred to were unnecessary.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Misc. 800, 63 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peploe-v-connors-nyappterm-1900.