Pepin v. Pepin
This text of 470 A.2d 224 (Pepin v. Pepin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the absence of findings of fact, which in this case were waived, our review of the record discloses that there is a reasonable evidentiary basis to support the judgment. Lanphere v. Beede, 141 Vt. 126, 128, 446 A.2d 340, 341 (1982). Since the trial court did not withhold its discretion, abuse it, or exercise it on grounds clearly untenable or to an extent clearly unreasonable, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 A.2d 224, 144 Vt. 647, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pepin-v-pepin-vt-1984.