Pepin v. Pepin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Pepin v. Pepin

470 A.2d 224, 144 Vt. 647, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 407

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 9, 1984·No. No. 556-81·Published

Opinion

In the absence of findings of fact, which in this case were waived, our review of the record discloses that there is a reasonable evidentiary basis to support the judgment. Lanphere v. Beede, 141 Vt. 126, 128, 446 A.2d 340, 341 (1982). Since the trial court did not withhold its discretion, abuse it, or exercise it on grounds clearly untenable or to an extent clearly unreasonable, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the absence of findings of fact, which in this case were waived, our review of the record discloses that there is a reasonable evidentiary basis to support the judgment. Lanphere v. Beede, 141 Vt. 126, 128, 446 A.2d 340, 341 (1982). Since the trial court did not withhold its discretion, abuse it, or exercise it on grounds clearly untenable or to an extent clearly unreasonable, the judgment is affirmed.

Pepin v. Pepin, 470 A.2d 224, 144 Vt. 647, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 407 (Vt. 1984).

Pincite

470 A.2d 224 (Pepin v. Pepin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related