Pepe v. Jankowski
232 A.D. 863
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 232 A.D. 863 (Pepe v. Jankowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pepe v. Jankowski, 232 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Judgment and order in the action of Elizabeth Repe v. Jankowski unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that these are separate actions, and the jury was justified in finding in the companion action of the husband, Samuel Pepe v. Jankowski, that he had suffered no substantial damage.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pepe-v-jankowski-nyappdiv-1931.