Pepe v. Arcuri

8 A.D.3d 1048, 778 N.Y.S.2d 404, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8253

This text of 8 A.D.3d 1048 (Pepe v. Arcuri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pepe v. Arcuri, 8 A.D.3d 1048, 778 N.Y.S.2d 404, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of [1049]*1049the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered December 21, 2001 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, dismissed in part the petition seeking certain documents and information under the Freedom of Information Law.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 1048, 778 N.Y.S.2d 404, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pepe-v-arcuri-nyappdiv-2004.