Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 24, 2007
Docket13-06-00019-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal (Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion





NUMBER13-06-019-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________



PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK OF DELAWARE, INC.

AND PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE AND JACK OF

CALIFORNIA, Appellants,



v.


ARMANDO LEAL, Appellee.



On appeal from the 92nd District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK OF DELAWARE, INC. AND PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE AND JACK OF CALIFORNIA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-1325-05-A. On January 3, 2007, this Court was notified that the above cause had settled and that a formal motion to dispose of the case would be filed.

On April 24, 2007, no motion or communication having been received from the parties, this Court requested that the parties either file an appropriate motion to dispose of the case or advise the Court of the status of the matter. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice was given that, if no response was received within ten days from the date of receipt of said notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellants' failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 24th day of May, 2007



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe and Jack of California v. Armando Leal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pep-boys-manny-moe-jack-of-delaware-inc-and-pep-bo-texapp-2007.