Peoria & Rock Island Railway Co. v. McClenahan

74 Ill. 435
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Ill. 435 (Peoria & Rock Island Railway Co. v. McClenahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peoria & Rock Island Railway Co. v. McClenahan, 74 Ill. 435 (Ill. 1874).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an action originally commenced before a justice of the peace, by appellee, to recover the value of a cow and calf killed upon the railroad track of appellant.

The record discloses two errors, for which the judgment must be reversed.

The first is, the judgment rendered in' the circuit court exceeded the demand of appellee, endorsed upon the back of the summons.

The law is well settled that in actions commenced before a justice of the peace, the recovery is limited to the demand endorsed upon the back of the summons. In this case the demand was $50, and the judgment rendered in the circuit court was for the sum of $56.50.

At the request of appellee, the court gave to the jury the following instruction: “ If the jury believe from the evidence that the said railroad company had made excavations along the side of the track of their road, and had negligently suffered said excavations to fill with water, and to freeze, so as to prevent the escape of said cow from said railroad track, and said cow was prevented from escaping in consequence thereof, and was killed by the defendants’ train, then the defendants are liable to the plaintiff for the value of the cow and calf so killed, deducting what said stock was worth after it was killed.”

This instruction was erroneous. The law does not require a railroad company to keep the excavations along the side of its track free and clear from water or ice.

In the construction and keeping in repair of the road bed, appellant, no doubt, necessarily made the excavations on each side of the track. In many instances it might be impracticable, if not impossible, to keep the excavations free from water and ice. To impose a requirement of this character upon appellant would not be just, neither is it sanctioned by the law.

The instruction should not have been given. For the two errors indicated the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kansas City v. Kirksey
48 Ark. 366 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ill. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoria-rock-island-railway-co-v-mcclenahan-ill-1874.