Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Ry. Co. v. Purviance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Ry. Co. v. Purviance

15 Ill. App. 112, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 61

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 22, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Ill. App. 112 (Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Ry. Co. v. Purviance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Ry. Co. v. Purviance, 15 Ill. App. 112, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 61 (Ill. Ct. App. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Davis, J.

This action was' brought by appellee to recover the value of eight hogs alleged to have been killed by a train on the railroad of appellant, and also to recover attorney’s fees given by statute.

The jury found a verdict for appellee of $78.50, and a judgment was rendered against appellant for that amount by the court below, and to reverse the judgment this appeal was taken.

it is claimed by appellant that the evidence given on the trial failed to show that the railroad had been open for use six months before the hogs were killed. It has been frequently held by the courts of this State, that to entitle a party to a recovery in cases of this kind, it must be shown that the railroad against which the suit is brought had been open for use six months before the injury complained of. The O. & M. Railroad Company v. Levi H. Jones, 27 Ill. 41; Same v. Meisenheimer, 27 Ill. 30; Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Neikirk, 13 Bradwell, 387.

This is a technical defense interposed, but while the statute remains as it is and the cases cited remain- unreversed, we must treat the defense as valid.

The record of the case now before us shows that no evidence whatever was offered of the time when the road of appellant was first opened for use, or that it had been opened for use six months before the hogs were injured or killed, for which a recovery is now sought. We are compelled, therefore, to reverse the judgment and remand the case.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis, J.

This action was' brought by appellee to recover the value of eight hogs alleged to have been killed by a train on the railroad of appellant, and also to recover attorney’s fees given by statute.

The jury found a verdict for appellee of $78.50, and a judgment was rendered against appellant for that amount by the court below, and to reverse the judgment this appeal was taken.

it is claimed by appellant that the evidence given on the trial failed to show that the railroad had been open for use six months before the hogs were killed. It has been frequently held by the courts of this State, that to entitle a party to a recovery in cases of this kind, it must be shown that the railroad against which the suit is brought had been open for use six months before the injury complained of. The O. & M. Railroad Company v. Levi H. Jones, 27 Ill. 41; Same v. Meisenheimer, 27 Ill. 30; Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Neikirk, 13 Bradwell, 387.

This is a technical defense interposed, but while the statute remains as it is and the cases cited remain- unreversed, we must treat the defense as valid.

The record of the case now before us shows that no evidence whatever was offered of the time when the road of appellant was first opened for use, or that it had been opened for use six months before the hogs were injured or killed, for which a recovery is now sought. We are compelled, therefore, to reverse the judgment and remand the case.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ill. App. 112, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoria-decatur-evansville-ry-co-v-purviance-illappct-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack