Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth
11 Ill. App. 358, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 73
Opinion
The causes for a new trial were specified in tlie motion filed therefor in the court below. It was not suggested as a cause for new trial that the damages were excessive. This being so, this ground for a new trial can not be urged in this court. Emory v. Addis, 71 Ill. 274; Jones v. Jones, Idem, 562; R. R. Co. v. McMath, 91 Ill. 104.
The judgment is affirmed.
Casey, J., took no part in the decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth, 11 Ill. App. 358, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 73 (Ill. Ct. App. 1882).
11 Ill. App. 358 (Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Demmer v. American Insurance
110 Ill. App. 580 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)