Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth

Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth

11 Ill. App. 358, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 73
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedSeptember 29, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Ill. App. 358 (Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. Booth, 11 Ill. App. 358, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 73 (Ill. Ct. App. 1882).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The causes for a new trial were specified in tlie motion filed therefor in the court below. It was not suggested as a cause for new trial that the damages were excessive. This being so, this ground for a new trial can not be urged in this court. Emory v. Addis, 71 Ill. 274; Jones v. Jones, Idem, 562; R. R. Co. v. McMath, 91 Ill. 104.

The judgment is affirmed.

Casey, J., took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demmer v. American Insurance
110 Ill. App. 580 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Ill. App. 358, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoria-decatur-evansville-railway-co-v-booth-illappct-1882.