PeoplevMcCaster

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 11, 2014
Docket105746
StatusPublished

This text of PeoplevMcCaster (PeoplevMcCaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PeoplevMcCaster, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: September 11, 2014 105746 ________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAYSON McCASTER, Appellant. ________________________________

Calendar Date: August 4, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, Garry and Lynch, JJ.

__________

Andrew Kossover, Public Defender, Kingston (Michael K. Gould of counsel), for appellant.

D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered January 30, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a prior felony offender to a prison term of five years, followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, contending that he was illegally sentenced as a second felony offender.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant's contention, "County Court was not obligated to expressly advise defendant of his right to contest the constitutionality of the prior conviction" -2- 105746

(People v Wilkins, 118 AD3d 1038, 1039 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). Here, the record demonstrates that defendant was provided with the prior felony information at sentencing and, after a discussion with his counsel, affirmed that he did not contest the prior felony statement and admitted that he previously was convicted of that felony. Under these circumstances, County Court substantially complied with the requirements of CPL 400.21 (3) and properly sentenced defendant as a second felony offender (see id. at 1039; People v Wood, 108 AD3d 932, 933 [2013]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, Garry and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wood
108 A.D.3d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Wilkins
118 A.D.3d 1038 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PeoplevMcCaster, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoplevmccaster-nyappdiv-2014.