PeoplevHouse
This text of PeoplevHouse (PeoplevHouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 31, 2014 105522 ________________________________
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES HOUSE, Appellant. ________________________________
Calendar Date: June 9, 2014
Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ.
__________
Andrew Kossover, Public Defender, Kingston (Michael K. Gould of counsel), for appellant.
D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered September 11, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was to be sentenced as a second felony offender to seven years in prison to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. He was sentenced accordingly and now appeals.
Defendant contends that he should not have been sentenced as a second felony offender because County Court did not give him the opportunity to contest the allegations contained in the prior -2- 105522
felony information in violation of CPL 400.21 (3). Defendant has not preserved this claim for our review as he failed to raise an objection at sentencing (see People v Deschaine, 116 AD3d 1303, 1303 [2014], lv denied ___ NY3d ___ [June 25, 2014]; People v Morse, 111 AD3d 1161, 1161 [2013]). Were we to consider this issue, we would find that there was substantial compliance with the statutory requirements (see People v Morse, 111 AD3d at 1161; People v Gathers, 106 AD3d 1333, 1334 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1073 [2013]; People v Walton, 101 AD3d 1489, 1490 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1105 [2013]).
Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PeoplevHouse, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoplevhouse-nyappdiv-2014.