PeoplevFarrell

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 2014
Docket106450
StatusPublished

This text of PeoplevFarrell (PeoplevFarrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PeoplevFarrell, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: December 4, 2014 106450 ________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD E. FARRELL JR., Appellant. ________________________________

Calendar Date: October 21, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

G. Scott Walling, Schenectady, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Sara E. Fischer of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered March 3, 2013, convicting defendant upon his guilty plea of the crime of attempted burglary in the third degree, as amended by judgment rendered October 18, 2013.

Defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the third degree in satisfaction of a two-count indictment and waived his right to appeal during the plea colloquy and signed a written appeal waiver in open court in exchange for a promised prison sentence, as a second felony offender, of 1½ to 3 years. On March 3, 2013, he was sentenced, as an admitted second felony offender, in accordance with the plea agreement. At an October 18, 2013 appearance, County Court reduced the conviction, on consent of the parties, to attempted burglary in the third degree to reflect -2- 106450

the parties' intent. The court adhered to the sentence imposed and corrected the uniform sentence and commitment order. This appeal followed.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and the briefs, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PeoplevFarrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoplevfarrell-nyappdiv-2014.