PeoplevAnderson

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 18, 2014
Docket105827
StatusPublished

This text of PeoplevAnderson (PeoplevAnderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PeoplevAnderson, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: September 18, 2014 105827 ________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MELVIN D. ANDERSON, Also Known as AK, Appellant. ________________________________

Calendar Date: August 4, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Lisa A. Burgess, Indian Lake, for appellant.

Andrew J. Wylie, District Attorney, Plattsburgh (Timothy G. Blatchley of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (Ryan, J.), rendered August 27, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (two counts).

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and purportedly waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant, as agreed, to an aggregate prison term of seven years to be followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

Defense counsel argues that no nonfrivolous issues exist to be raised upon appeal and seeks to be relieved of her assignment. -2- 105827

We disagree. Our review of the record discloses an issue of arguable merit regarding the validity of defendant's appeal waiver that may, in turn, implicate other potential appellate issues (see People v Slavin, 114 AD3d 1082, 1082 [2014]; People v Whitted, 106 AD3d 1286, 1287 [2013]). We thus grant counsel's request for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address that issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Whitted
106 A.D.3d 1286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Slavin
114 A.D.3d 1082 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PeoplevAnderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoplevanderson-nyappdiv-2014.