Peoplev. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peoplev. Jackson

80 A.D.2d 647, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10352

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.2d 647 (Peoplev. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peoplev. Jackson, 80 A.D.2d 647, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 21, 1979, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (four counts), assault in the second degree, grand [648]*648larceny in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Case remitted to the County Court to hear and report on the issue of whether the defendant was deprived of his right to a speedy trial (see CPL 30.20, 30.30), and appeal held in abeyance during the interim. Due, in part, to the failure of the County Court to order a hearing on defendant’s speedy trial motion, the record is insufficient to permit us to intelligently review defendant’s claim that his right to a speedy trial has been violated. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 21, 1979, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (four counts), assault in the second degree, grand [648]*648larceny in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Case remitted to the County Court to hear and report on the issue of whether the defendant was deprived of his right to a speedy trial (see CPL 30.20, 30.30), and appeal held in abeyance during the interim. Due, in part, to the failure of the County Court to order a hearing on defendant’s speedy trial motion, the record is insufficient to permit us to intelligently review defendant’s claim that his right to a speedy trial has been violated. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 647, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoplev-jackson-nyappdiv-1981.