Peoples v. State

86 S.W.3d 71, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1537, 2002 WL 1545202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peoples v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 303
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 16, 2002·No. No. ED 79938·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Larry Peoples, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his trial attorney coerced him into pleading guilty by failing to fully investigate his case.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peoples v. State, 86 S.W.3d 71, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1537, 2002 WL 1545202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

86 S.W.3d 71 (Peoples v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.