People's Trust & Guaranty Co. v. Genden

187 A. 35, 121 N.J. Eq. 54
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of fact contained in the report of the special master, the late Mr. Justice James F. Minturn, and also with the conclusions of the vice-chancellor dismissing the exceptions filed against said master’s report and directing that the same stand in all things confirmed.

A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the judicial conclusions are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced and by the decisions cited.

The decree is therefore affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor.

No. 59— For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10. For reversal — -None. No. 73— For affirmance — Lloyd, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 6. For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, JJ. 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People's Trust & Guaranty Co. v. Genden, 187 A. 35, 121 N.J. Eq. 54 (N.J. 1936).

187 A. 35 (People's Trust & Guaranty Co. v. Genden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Midler v. Heinowitz
89 A.2d 458 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)
Oliver v. Autographic Register Co.
7 A.2d 797 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)