People's Savings Bank v. Alexander

2 Sadler 287
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 19, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This contention arises on an executory agreement wherein the vendor covenanted to sell and convey in fee simple “by a good and marketable title with general warranty and clear of all liens and encumbrances.” The master has found as a fact, in an opinion well fortified by authority, that the appellant is not able to convey by such a title. The court confirmed this finding.

It is well settled by the authorities that a vendee, without knowledge of any defect in title when the agreement was executed, is not compelled to accept a doubtful title, or one that will probably require a lawsuit to establish its validity.

We discover no error in this decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People's Savings Bank v. Alexander, 2 Sadler 287 (Pa. 1886).

2 Sadler 287 (People's Savings Bank v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Ernest
44 V.I. 153 (Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands, 2002)
Ritter v. Hill
127 A. 455 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)