People's Savings Bank v. Alexander
This text of 2 Sadler 287 (People's Savings Bank v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This contention arises on an executory agreement wherein the vendor covenanted to sell and convey in fee simple “by a good and marketable title with general warranty and clear of all liens and encumbrances.” The master has found as a fact, in an opinion well fortified by authority, that the appellant is not able to convey by such a title. The court confirmed this finding.
It is well settled by the authorities that a vendee, without knowledge of any defect in title when the agreement was executed, is not compelled to accept a doubtful title, or one that will probably require a lawsuit to establish its validity.
We discover no error in this decree.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Sadler 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-savings-bank-v-alexander-pa-1886.