Peoples' S. Bank v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Peoples' S. Bank v. Alexander

21 A. 248, 140 Pa. 22, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 794

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 16, 1891

DocketNo. 46

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A. 248 (Peoples' S. Bank v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peoples' S. Bank v. Alexander, 21 A. 248, 140 Pa. 22, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 794 (Pa. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of opinion that there was abundance of evidence from which the jury might properly find an agreement or understanding between Henry Brown and John Alexander that Brown should and did accept Willis Booth as tenant in lieu of Alexander, and released the latter from liability under his covenant. This is all there is in the case. It was a question of fact, which the court below properly submitted to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We are of opinion that there was abundance of evidence from which the jury might properly find an agreement or understanding between Henry Brown and John Alexander that Brown should and did accept Willis Booth as tenant in lieu of Alexander, and released the latter from liability under his covenant. This is all there is in the case. It was a question of fact, which the court below properly submitted to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A. 248, 140 Pa. 22, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-s-bank-v-alexander-pa-1891.