People's National Bank v. State ex rel. Emerson

65 N.E. 6, 159 Ind. 353, 1902 Ind. LEXIS 40
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 1902·No. No. 19,796·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Dowling, C. J.

— This is a proceeding by the appellees, who were, respectively, the assessor and the auditor of Gibson county, for a writ of mandamus to compel the appellant [354]*354to grant to them an inspection of its books showing the names of its depositors, and the amounts to their credit on April 1, 1899. The action was brought in the Gibson Circuit Court in September, 1899, and a change of venue was taken to the superior court of Vanderburgh county. An alternative writ was issued, to which the appellant made its return in nine paragraphs; the first being a general denial, and the others setting up special matters of defense. Demurrers to all of the special answers were sustained. The cause was tried upon the issue made by the general denial, and judgment directing the issuing of a peremptory writ of mandate was rendered.

The defendant below appealed, and filed its transcript in this court on the 6th day of March, 1902. Nine errors were properly assigned. On June 2, 1902, printed briefs for the appellant were filed, in which the supposed errors of the trial court were fully discussed. Two- hundred days have elapsed since the submission of the cause, and, although the questions. raised by the assignment of errors and presented by counsel for appellant in their briefs are important ones, no brief has been filed, on behalf of the appellees, and no attention has been given by them to this appeal.

In view of the failure of the appellees to controvert any of the grounds upon which a reversal of the judgment is demanded, we feel justified in regarding their silence and neglect as a confession of error; and under the rules of this court as announced in Berkshire v. Caley, 157 Ind. 1, and Neu v. Town of Bourbon, 157 Ind. 476, without intending to express any opinion upon the questions of law presented in the record, we reverse the judgment at the cost of the appellees, but without prejudice to'either party. Cause remanded to Vanderburgh Superior Court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People's National Bank v. State ex rel. Emerson, 65 N.E. 6, 159 Ind. 353, 1902 Ind. LEXIS 40 (Ind. 1902).

65 N.E. 6 (People's National Bank v. State ex rel. Emerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. School Town of Oakland City
171 N.E. 378 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1930)
Miller v. Ray
142 N.E. 654 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1924)
Keeley v. Bradford
113 N.E. 748 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1916)
Burroughs v. Burroughs
103 N.E. 1 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1913)
Brier v. Mankey
93 N.E. 672 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Wysong v. Sells
88 N.E. 954 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)
Rose v. Arford
88 N.E. 302 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
Hanrahan v. Knickerbocker
72 N.E. 1137 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Miller v. Julian
72 N.E. 588 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1904)
Union Traction Co. v. Forst
70 N.E. 979 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1904)
Moore v. Zumbrun
70 N.E. 800 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1904)