Peoples National Bank v. Niquette

174 P. 582, 103 Kan. 493, 1918 Kan. LEXIS 304
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peoples National Bank v. Niquette. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 Kan. 410
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided October 12, 1918·No. No. 21,642·Published

Opinion

[494]*494The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The appellants have filed a petition for a rehearing upon the ground that the decision rendered is contrary to the evidence and to the law as previously declared. ■ The court remains of its former opinion, and the petition is denied.

W. H. Mitchell, a defendant in the action against whom judgment was rendered, files a separate petition for a rehearing in which he claims that there are special reasons, applicable in his case, for a reversal. As no notice of appeal was ever served in behalf of this defendant, so far as the records of this court show, there is nothing before us upon which an examination could be made upon the merits of his contention. Therefore, this petition is also overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peoples National Bank v. Niquette, 174 P. 582, 103 Kan. 493, 1918 Kan. LEXIS 304 (kan 1918).

174 P. 582 (Peoples National Bank v. Niquette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.