People's Mut. F. Ins. v. Groff
This text of 26 A. 63 (People's Mut. F. Ins. v. Groff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the judgment against defendant for want of á sufficient affidavit of defence to plaintiff’s amended statement. In his opinion, sent up with the record, the learned judge of the common pleas has clearly pointed out wherein the affidavit of defence is defective. There appears to be no error in making the rule absolute and entering judgment in favor of plaintiff company for the amount of its claim. For reasons given in the opinion referred to, the judgment should be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 63, 154 Pa. 200, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-mut-f-ins-v-groff-pa-1893.