Peoples Funeral Service, Inc. v. Mallard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Peoples Funeral Service, Inc. v. Mallard

337 S.W.2d 476, 1960 Tex. App. LEXIS 2417

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 29, 1960

Docket13620

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 337 S.W.2d 476 (Peoples Funeral Service, Inc. v. Mallard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peoples Funeral Service, Inc. v. Mallard, 337 S.W.2d 476, 1960 Tex. App. LEXIS 2417 (Tex. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted in the District Court of Dallas County by Dee Nelson Mallard et ux., against Richard Wright, Jr., and Peoples Funeral Home, alleging property damages and personal injuries to Dee Nelson Mallard' and his wife as a result of the negligence of Richard Wright, Jr., who was alleged to be an agent of Peoples Funeral Home. Citation was issued on March 31, 1959, and was returned by the Constable on April 2, 1959. Thereafter, on the 29th day of April, 1959, default judgment was rendered in favor of Dee Nelson Mallard et ux., against Richard Wright, Jr., and Peoples Funeral Home in the sum of $2,250, from which judgment Peoples Funeral Service, Inc., has perfected this appeal by writ of error. The correct name of appellant seems to be as stated next above.

Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in rendering a default judgment against it because the officer’s return on the citation was fatally defective as to it. There is no appeal by Richard Wright, Jr.

The pertinent part of the officer’s return on the citation reads as follows,:

“Executed at Dallas, Texas, within the County of Dallas, at-o’clock —M., on the 1st day of April, 1959, by delivering to the within named Richard Wright, Jr., at 2:30 o’clock P. M. and Peoples Funeral Home by serving their agent, C. F. Starks, Vice President at 10:00 o’clock A. M. defendants each, in person, a true copy of this Citation together with the accompanying copy of this petition, having first endorsed on same the date of delivery.”

The return to all intents and purposes is the same as the return in Hyltin-Manor Funeral Home, Inc. v. Hill, 304 S.W.2d 469, a case decided by this Court on July 17, 1957. In that case we held that the return was fatally defective and insufficient to support a default judgment. We see no reason for not following that decision. What we said in that opinion applies with equal force here.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted in the District Court of Dallas County by Dee Nelson Mallard et ux., against Richard Wright, Jr., and Peoples Funeral Home, alleging property damages and personal injuries to Dee Nelson Mallard' and his wife as a result of the negligence of Richard Wright, Jr., who was alleged to be an agent of Peoples Funeral Home. Citation was issued on March 31, 1959, and was returned by the Constable on April 2, 1959. Thereafter, on the 29th day of April, 1959, default judgment was rendered in favor of Dee Nelson Mallard et ux., against Richard Wright, Jr., and Peoples Funeral Home in the sum of $2,250, from which judgment Peoples Funeral Service, Inc., has perfected this appeal by writ of error. The correct name of appellant seems to be as stated next above.

Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in rendering a default judgment against it because the officer’s return on the citation was fatally defective as to it. There is no appeal by Richard Wright, Jr.

The pertinent part of the officer’s return on the citation reads as follows,:

“Executed at Dallas, Texas, within the County of Dallas, at-o’clock —M., on the 1st day of April, 1959, by delivering to the within named Richard Wright, Jr., at 2:30 o’clock P. M. and Peoples Funeral Home by serving their agent, C. F. Starks, Vice President at 10:00 o’clock A. M. defendants each, in person, a true copy of this Citation together with the accompanying copy of this petition, having first endorsed on same the date of delivery.”

The return to all intents and purposes is the same as the return in Hyltin-Manor Funeral Home, Inc. v. Hill, 304 S.W.2d 469, a case decided by this Court on July 17, 1957. In that case we held that the return was fatally defective and insufficient to support a default judgment. We see no reason for not following that decision. What we said in that opinion applies with equal force here.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

337 S.W.2d 476, 1960 Tex. App. LEXIS 2417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-funeral-service-inc-v-mallard-texapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack