Peoples Cab Co., a Corporation Qualified as a Public Utility Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. George I. Bloom

472 F.2d 163, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7082
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 1972
Docket71-1989
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 472 F.2d 163 (Peoples Cab Co., a Corporation Qualified as a Public Utility Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. George I. Bloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peoples Cab Co., a Corporation Qualified as a Public Utility Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. George I. Bloom, 472 F.2d 163, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7082 (3d Cir. 1972).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is a suit for damages under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, brought by a certificated taxicab company and its sole stockholders against the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission. After the plaintiffs had amended their original complaint, the district court, 330 F.Supp. 1235, granted a motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs have appealed.

We agree with the district court that so much of the complaint as alleges in substance that the defendant has slandered the plaintiffs and their business does not assert the violation of any right protected by the Civil Rights Act. The district court also ruled that the other allegations of the complaint lacked *164 “the factual specificity required to support a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act.” That ruling was correct.

Finally, while the original complaint was dismissed “without prejudice,” the order appealed from is not so limited. No reason appears for affording the plaintiffs another opportunity to plead after twice failing to make an adequate factual statement of any basis for relief.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Church of Scientology of California v. Cazares
455 F. Supp. 420 (M.D. Florida, 1978)
Hazo v. Geetz
395 F. Supp. 1331 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Crime Commission
67 F.R.D. 425 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
Fram v. Yellow Cab Company of Pittsburgh
380 F. Supp. 1314 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
PAAC v. Rizzo
502 F.2d 306 (Third Circuit, 1974)
Mimms v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.
352 F. Supp. 862 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F.2d 163, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-cab-co-a-corporation-qualified-as-a-public-utility-under-the-laws-ca3-1972.