People's Bank v. Bartlett

633 A.2d 739, 33 Conn. App. 901, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 422
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedNovember 2, 1993
Docket12173
StatusPublished

This text of 633 A.2d 739 (People's Bank v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People's Bank v. Bartlett, 633 A.2d 739, 33 Conn. App. 901, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 422 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, the owner of the equity of redemption appeals from the trial court’s denial of his request that the court order a strict foreclosure or, in the alternative, order a new sale date of July 1, 1993. Whether to order foreclosure by sale, and the date of the sale, rest in the discretion of the trial court. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Sullivan, 216 Conn. 341, 355, 579 A.2d 1054 (1990). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in this case.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting a new sale date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Sullivan
579 A.2d 1054 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 A.2d 739, 33 Conn. App. 901, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-bank-v-bartlett-connappct-1993.