Peoples Bank v. Armour Fertilizer Works

123 S.E. 864, 158 Ga. 568, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 300
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 18, 1924
DocketNo. 4307
StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 864 (Peoples Bank v. Armour Fertilizer Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peoples Bank v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 123 S.E. 864, 158 Ga. 568, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 300 (Ga. 1924).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial, which was based solely upon the general grounds. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. 8. Eolderness, for plaintiff in error. Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 S.E. 864, 158 Ga. 568, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peoples-bank-v-armour-fertilizer-works-ga-1924.