Peoples Bank of Tuscaloosa v. Computer Room, Inc. (In Re Computer Room, Inc.)

24 B.R. 732, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 2932
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama·Decided November 12, 1982·No. 19-80316·Published·Cited by 43 cases

Opinion

GEORGE S. WRIGHT, Bankruptcy Judge.

ORDER OF THE COURT

The issue before the Court is whether the doctrine of marshaling of assets should be invoked.

I.FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The Computer Room, Inc. filed a Chapter 7 petition on November 25, 1981.

2. On July 1, 1981, the creditor, First Alabama Bank of Tuscaloosa, N.A. (FAB) perfected a general security interest in debtor’s accounts receivable, inventory (including tangible personal property) and contract rights (Fund # 1), as security for a debt of $9,842.88.

3. On September 18, 1981, Peoples Bank of Tuscaloosa (Peoples Bank) perfected a security interest in a specific accounts receivable of the debtor (invoice from the State of Alabama Highway Department) (Fund # 2) as security for a loan of $6,807.90. This obligation was guaranteed individually by Jackson Mathews, who was President and a principal stockholder (Fund # 3). The debtor used the loan proceeds from Peoples Bank to purchase computer equipment necessary to complete contract work with the State of Alabama Highway Department.

4. On December 3, 1981, (eight days after petition and before the § 341 meeting) the attorney for the debtor, Claude M. *734 Burns, Jr., collected the specific accounts receivable from the State of Alabama Highway Department of $9,308.86, and also collected other accounts receivable and other funds of $4,043.67 — making a grand total of $13,352.53, and has retained and invested such funds at interest by agreement of the parties.

5. On December 17, 1981, Peoples Bank filed an adversary proceeding to invoke the equitable doctrine of marshaling of assets.

6. Al Vreeland, as Trustee, has inventory in his possession of $29,100.00 cost value.

II. CONCLUSIONS OP LAW

The doctrine of marshaling of assets (or the “two funds” doctrine) is applied “when two or more creditors claim against one debtor and the first creditor can reach two properties held by the debtor whereas the second can reach only one.” In re Beacon Distributors, Inc., 441 F.2d 547 (1st Cir.1971); Meyer v. United States, 375 U.S. 233, 236, 84 S.Ct. 318, 11 L.Ed.2d 293 (1963); Merchants & Mechanics Bank v. Sewell, 61 F.2d 814 (5th Cir.1932); Houston v. Phillips, 189 F.2d 115 (5th Cir.1951). 1

The elements of marshaling of assets are:

1. That they are creditors of same debt- or.
2. That there are two funds belonging to that debtor, and
3. That one of them alone has right to resort to both funds. 2

Diagrammatically, the marshaling of assets’ doctrine is as set out below:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peoples Bank of Tuscaloosa v. Computer Room, Inc. (In Re Computer Room, Inc.), 24 B.R. 732, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 2932 (Ala. 1982).

24 B.R. 732 (Peoples Bank of Tuscaloosa v. Computer Room, Inc. (In Re Computer Room, Inc.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Blagg
372 B.R. 502 (D. Kansas, 2007)
Ramette v. United States (In Re Bame)
271 B.R. 354 (D. Minnesota, 2001)
In re Technologies International Holdings, Inc.
256 B.R. 476 (E.D. Kentucky, 2000)
In Re a & R Wholesale Distrib., Inc.
232 B.R. 616 (D. New Jersey, 1999)
In Re Christie
218 B.R. 27 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
In Re Speir
190 B.R. 657 (N.D. Alabama, 1995)
In Re Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc.
150 B.R. 296 (D. Rhode Island, 1993)
In Re San Jacinto Glass Industries, Inc.
93 B.R. 934 (S.D. Texas, 1988)
Matter of New Woodbridge Barrel & Drum Co., Inc.
99 B.R. 221 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
In Re Craner
110 B.R. 111 (N.D. New York, 1988)
Craner v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In re Craner)
110 B.R. 111 (N.D. New York, 1988)
In Re Laeupple
87 B.R. 74 (W.D. Missouri, 1988)