People v.O'Diah
This text of 68 A.D.3d 787 (People v.O'Diah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s contention that his waiver of the right to a jury trial was inadequate is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Magnano, 77 NY2d 941 [1991], cert denied 502 US 864 [1991]). In any event, the record does not support the defendant’s contention that the waiver was invalid, as he executed a written waiver in open court, which was approved by the trial justice, and the circumstances surround[788]*788ing the waiver supported the conclusion that it was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see CPL 320.10 [2]; People v Smith, 6 NY3d 827, 828 [2006], cert denied 548 US 905 [2006]; People v Fani, 59 AD3d 460 [2009]; People v Jones, 293 AD2d 627 [2002]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 A.D.3d 787, 888 N.Y.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-vodiah-nyappdiv-2009.