People v. Zurenda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zurenda

115 A.D.2d 948, 497 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55309

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.2d 948 (People v. Zurenda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zurenda, 115 A.D.2d 948, 497 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The defendant appeals from his convictions for second degree murder, first degree kidnapping, second degree conspiracy, various weapons charges and one count of hindering the prosecution in the first degree. We find no error concerning the court’s charge of duress. We have examined the other arguments raised by the defendant, including those in his pro se brief, and find that none requires reversal. The transcript of the Cardonna hearing has also been reviewed by this court and there is no reason to disturb the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s suppression motion. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flynn, J.—murder, second degree, and other charges.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The defendant appeals from his convictions for second degree murder, first degree kidnapping, second degree conspiracy, various weapons charges and one count of hindering the prosecution in the first degree. We find no error concerning the court’s charge of duress. We have examined the other arguments raised by the defendant, including those in his pro se brief, and find that none requires reversal. The transcript of the Cardonna hearing has also been reviewed by this court and there is no reason to disturb the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s suppression motion. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flynn, J.—murder, second degree, and other charges.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 948, 497 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zurenda-nyappdiv-1985.