People v. Zuckerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zuckerman

75 A.D.2d 905, 428 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11557

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 75 A.D.2d 905 (People v. Zuckerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zuckerman, 75 A.D.2d 905, 428 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed April 7, 1980, on his conviction of grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite prison term of six months and a fine of $2,500. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a fine of $2,500 and intermittent imprisonment for a period of six months, to be served on each weekend from 8:00 a.m. Saturday until 5:00 p.m. Sunday, with defendant to receive credit for time already served. As so modified sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed April 7, 1980, on his conviction of grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite prison term of six months and a fine of $2,500. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a fine of $2,500 and intermittent imprisonment for a period of six months, to be served on each weekend from 8:00 a.m. Saturday until 5:00 p.m. Sunday, with defendant to receive credit for time already served. As so modified sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.D.2d 905, 428 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zuckerman-nyappdiv-1980.