People v. Zorcik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zorcik

109 A.D.2d 860, 486 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47375

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 860 (People v. Zorcik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zorcik, 109 A.D.2d 860, 486 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.), rendered January 3,1984, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The element of knowledge, with respect to stolen property, can be established by circumstantial evidence (People v Reisman, 29 NY2d 278, 285-286, cert denied 405 US 1041). There was sufficient evidence in the instant case from which knowledge, on the part of the defendant, could be inferred.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either without merit or not preserved for appellate review. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.), rendered January 3,1984, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The element of knowledge, with respect to stolen property, can be established by circumstantial evidence (People v Reisman, 29 NY2d 278, 285-286, cert denied 405 US 1041). There was sufficient evidence in the instant case from which knowledge, on the part of the defendant, could be inferred.

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either without merit or not preserved for appellate review. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 860, 486 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zorcik-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack