People v. Zollinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zollinger

257 A.D.2d 674, 682 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 617

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D.2d 674 (People v. Zollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zollinger, 257 A.D.2d 674, 682 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), both rendered March 20, 1997, convicting her of robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 2914/96 and robbery in the first degree (three counts) under Indictment No. 3004/96, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which [675]*675could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Miller, J. P., Thompson, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), both rendered March 20, 1997, convicting her of robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 2914/96 and robbery in the first degree (three counts) under Indictment No. 3004/96, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which [675]*675could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Miller, J. P., Thompson, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D.2d 674, 682 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zollinger-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack